【時事】剴剴案保母虐童事件

剴剴案

剴剴案保母虐童事件引發國人共憤。一名1歲多的小男童剴剴在2023年12月24日到院前死亡，檢警發現有虐童行為，2024年1、2月分別收押劉姓保母姊妹。4月30日，保母劉彩萱認罪，坦承傷害、妨害自由、凌虐兒童致死3罪，因一審開庭揭露更多案件細節，再度引爆民眾怒火。為何這起虐童案引發網友大量討論？在一層一層的社會安全網中，小男童為何被漏接？

The Kai-Kai babysitter child abuse case has sparked widespread outrage across Taiwan. A young boy, just over one year old, named Kai-Kai, was pronounced dead before arrival at the hospital on December 24, 2023. Investigators discovered evidence of child abuse, and in January and February 2024, two babysitter sisters surnamed Liu were detained. On April 30, babysitter Liu Cai-Xuan confessed to charges of causing injury, unlawful detention, and child abuse resulting in death. As the first trial revealed even more disturbing details, it reignited public anger.

這些爭議引發社會各界關注，不僅在網路上已有大量民眾於「公共政策參與平台」上連署，要求加重虐童致死的刑責，許多人也持續呼籲「剴剴案不能沉」，號召「剴剴戰士」前往法院聲援，為發聲。

Why has this child abuse case triggered such massive discussion online? Despite the multiple layers of the social safety net, how did the boy slip through the cracks?
These controversies have drawn significant attention from all sectors of society. Thousands of people have already signed petitions on the "Public Policy Participation Platform," demanding harsher penalties for child abuse resulting in death. Many continue to stress that the Kai-Kai case must not be forgotten, rallying "Kai-Kai Warriors" to show support at the courthouse and raise their voices for justice.

剴剴生前發生什麼事？

小男童的媽媽因感情糾紛犯下重罪，被逮捕後遭到檢方收押並起訴，因她有孕在身，便向法官聲請保外生產，以3萬元交保重獲自由。懷孕期間，這位媽媽就曾向社福單位表示出養意願。

The boy’s mother committed a serious crime stemming from a relationship dispute. After her arrest, she was detained and indicted by prosecutors. Because she was pregnant at the time, she petitioned the court for medical parole to give birth outside of custody and was released on bail of NT$30,000. During her pregnancy, she had already expressed her intention to place the child for adoption to social welfare authorities.

2022年2月出生的剴剴，1歲小小年紀遭遇家庭失能，父親失蹤、生母被判入監服刑，入監前找到一名私人保母照顧孩子，該名保母與剴剴相處一段時間後有了感情，本想透過程序申請收養男嬰，但卻因為資格不符（離過婚）而被新北市社會局拒絕。

Born in February 2022, Kai-Kai faced hardship from a very young age. His father disappeared, and his mother was sentenced to prison. Before serving her sentence, she found a private babysitter to care for her child. Over time, the babysitter developed a bond with Kai-Kai and intended to formally adopt him. However, the New Taipei City Social Affairs Bureau rejected the adoption request because the babysitter did not meet the eligibility criteria (she was divorced).

2022年2月21日，在新北市生下小男童後，這位媽媽失聯逃亡，遭到法院通緝。小男孩監護權改判給外婆，之後因外婆無法負擔保母費用，轉而求助社會局，社會局交由社福機構（兒福聯盟）安排保母照顧，並在去年9月起，將剴剴委托該劉姓保母姐妹照顧。
由兒福聯盟接案。

On February 21, 2022, after giving birth to the baby boy in New Taipei City, the mother absconded and was subsequently listed as a fugitive by the court. Custody of the child was transferred to the maternal grandmother. Later, because the grandmother could not afford the babysitting fees, she sought help from the Social Affairs Bureau. The bureau then arranged care through a social welfare organization (the Child Welfare League Foundation). In September last year, Kai-Kai was placed in the care of the Liu sisters, who were babysitters appointed through the foundation.
The case was handled by the Child Welfare League Foundation.

惡魔在此

2023年9月前，男童皆由新北一名保母照顧，保母也有意願收養。2023年9月開始，兒盟開始接手男童，須由兒盟合作保母照顧，新北保母非合作對象，男童改由台北市劉姓保母照顧。

Before September 2023, the boy had been cared for by a babysitter in New Taipei City, who had also expressed a desire to adopt him. However, starting in September 2023, the Child Welfare League Foundation (CWLF) took over responsibility for the boy’s case, requiring that he be cared for by a babysitter partnered with CWLF. Since the original babysitter in New Taipei was not a partner caregiver, custody was transferred to the Liu sisters, babysitters based in Taipei City.

=====警告線=====

2023年12月24日凌晨，警方接獲醫院報案，指出台北市一名男童（剴剴）因呼吸困難送醫，但全身有多處不正常傷勢，到院時已停止呼吸心跳，緊急搶救後仍宣告不治。驗屍後發現男童除了營養不良，還有頭骨、尾椎受損，多顆牙齒被打斷、指甲被拔光，甚至生殖器也呈現焦黑貌。



In the early hours of December 24, 2023, police received a report from a hospital stating that a young boy (Kai-Kai) in Taipei City had been rushed to the hospital due to breathing difficulties. The boy showed multiple suspicious injuries across his body and was found without vital signs upon arrival. Despite emergency resuscitation efforts, he was pronounced dead. The autopsy revealed malnutrition, head and coccyx injuries, multiple broken teeth, torn-out fingernails, and even burn-like injuries to his genital area.

台北地檢署在2024年1月9日將劉姓保母拘提到案，2月再傳喚劉女妹妹到案說明，兩人皆否認犯案，還聲稱傷勢都是小孩「自己撞」、「跌倒」所致，兒福聯盟在2023年9月25日、10月23日、11月20日三次探視都說「無異狀」，但檢警調查認定劉姓姊妹倆涉有重嫌，依涉犯虐童致死罪聲押獲准。

2024年3月11日，剴剴親友在臉書上揭露此事，指控這段時間內，兒福聯盟社工不斷以各種理由拒絕親友訪視，更稱社工「一直做假報告，說你（剴剴）過得很好」。該案曝光後，引起社會高度關注。

On January 9, 2024, the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office arrested the Liu sisters for questioning. In February, Liu’s younger sister was also summoned for further investigation. Both denied any wrongdoing, claiming the injuries were the result of the child "bumping himself" or "falling down." Meanwhile, CWLF had conducted three welfare checks on September 25, October 23, and November 20, 2023, each time reporting "no abnormalities." However, the police and prosecutors determined that the Liu sisters were strongly suspected of causing the boy’s death and successfully sought their detention on charges of child abuse resulting in death.

On March 11, 2024, Kai-Kai’s relatives revealed the case publicly on Facebook, alleging that during this period, CWLF social workers repeatedly refused their requests to visit, citing various excuses. They also accused the social workers of "falsifying reports, claiming that you (Kai-Kai) were doing well." Once exposed, the case drew intense public attention.

惡保母身家被起底　冷血發言激怒網友

案件曝光後，傳出檢警詢問劉姓保母為何下重手時，她竟冷血回應，因為這個小孩爸媽沒有來巴結，所以一看到小孩就想揍，還說出「要不是為孫中山（指紙鈔），根本不想照顧他」等話語，讓網友相當憤怒。

After the case came to light, reports emerged that when investigators questioned Liu, the babysitter, about why she had been so violent, she coldly replied that it was because the child’s parents never tried to curry favor with her. She admitted that every time she saw the boy, she felt the urge to hit him, even saying things like, "If it weren’t for Sun Yat-sen (a slang reference to money, meaning paper bills), I wouldn’t have bothered taking care of him." These remarks sparked widespread outrage online.

近日，劉姓保母的身家也被網友起底，老公自稱士官長，目前經營開百萬海釣船接客海釣多年，在淡水小有名氣。劉女家族則擁3棟房，總戶數至少12戶，市價粗估破億元。劉姓保母全家與妹妹住在三樓公寓，一、二樓是出租給租客，每月租金約1萬元左右。

Recently, internet users have also dug into Liu’s background. Her husband, who claims to be a sergeant major, has been running a million-dollar deep-sea fishing business for years and is fairly well known in Tamsui. Liu’s family reportedly owns three buildings, totaling at least 12 apartment units, with an estimated market value exceeding NT$100 million. Liu and her entire family, including her sister, live in a third-floor apartment, while the first and second floors are rented out to tenants, generating about NT$10,000 per month in rental income.

剴剴事件被揭開是因為2023年的平安夜，那一晚剴剴被送往醫院急救，劉姓保母聲稱是「溢奶死亡」，但醫院發現情況不對，因為男童全身都有傷，並堅持通報警方。
男童剴剴被發現時，傷勢有：身上體無完膚、牙齒被打斷剩下8顆、10根手指甲全遭拔、尾椎骨塌陷、口鼻遭踹重創、生殖器燒黑，身上多重遭遇虐待的傷口，看了令人心碎。

The Kai-Kai case came to light because of what happened on Christmas Eve in 2023. That night, Kai-Kai was rushed to the hospital for emergency treatment. The babysitter, Liu, claimed that the boy had died from "choking on milk," but the hospital staff quickly realized something was wrong. The boy’s body was covered in injuries, and the hospital insisted on reporting the case to the police.

When Kai-Kai was found, his injuries were devastating: his entire body was battered and bruised, his teeth were broken down to just eight remaining, all ten of his fingernails had been ripped out, his coccyx was crushed, his mouth and nose had been severely kicked, and his genitals were burned black. The multiple wounds from repeated abuse painted a heartbreaking picture.

男童到院前死亡，檢方調查發現虐童，2024年1月、2月分別收押劉姓保母姊妹。

剴剴保母惡毒行徑被外傭勇敢揭發！

保母家的劉姓外傭表示：「平常也與剴剴生活在一起，常常看見剴剴被虐待，目睹他被綁著睡覺、逼喝餿水，還會把男童塞進水桶。」

剴剴案先前開庭重點整理

保母姐妹部分：（檢方依凌虐兒童致死罪起訴）

2024年9月25日：首次開庭，劉姓保母姐妹否認犯行，並聲請延押庭不公開審理失敗後，又聲請不行國民參審，也遭駁回。一審裁定延押2個月，並禁止接見通信。

September 25, 2024: The first court hearing was held. The Liu sisters (the babysitters) denied all charges. After their request for a closed detention hearing was rejected, they also applied to block participation by lay judges (citizen jurors), which was likewise denied. The court ruled to extend their detention by two months and prohibited visits and correspondence.

2024年12月25日：第二次開庭，保母姐妹否認犯行。

2025年2月5日：第三次開庭，保母姐姐只承認傷害剴剴，否認致死，保母妹妹則堅稱自己無罪，更提出要聲請證據調查，證明剴剴本身有「異常行為」。


2025年3月19日：第四次開庭，審判長逐一確認審理期日及流程，宣布全案今天準備程序終結，近期進行選任國民法官程序，4月21日續行審理，4月22日起至5月7日進行審理。法官與國民法官評議時間為5月8日至5月13日，預計5月13日下午2時30分宣判。


2025年4月29日：台北地院國民法官庭29、30日陸續開庭，法醫許倬憲作證表示，死亡方式為他殺，遭他人傷害致死；醫師呂立作證說，鑑定結果42處傷勢，非常確定是虐待，且是非常嚴重的虐待。


2025年4月30日：劉彩萱偵查階段不認罪，起訴後收押禁見，經數名鑑定人連續到庭證述後，劉女承認凌虐兒童妨害身心發展致死、凌虐兒童妨害自由致死、傷害兒童致死3罪，當庭哭著說「對不起」。


December 25, 2024: The second court hearing took place. The babysitter sisters again denied all charges.


February 5, 2025: At the third hearing, the elder Liu sister admitted to injuring Kai-Kai but denied causing his death. The younger sister insisted on her innocence and filed a motion to request evidence investigation, claiming that Kai-Kai had exhibited "abnormal behavior."



March 19, 2025: The fourth hearing was held. The presiding judge confirmed the hearing dates and procedures, announcing that the preparatory phase was concluded. The process of selecting lay judges would follow, with trial sessions scheduled for April 21 and continuing from April 22 to May 7. Deliberations by judges and lay judges were set for May 8 to May 13, with the verdict expected to be announced at 2:30 p.m. on May 13.



April 29, 2025: The Taipei District Court’s lay judge panel held hearings on April 29 and 30. Forensic expert Hsu Chuo-Hsien testified that the cause of death was homicide—inflicted by another person. Dr. Lü Li testified that the medical examination revealed 42 injuries, confirming that it was a case of child abuse, describing it as extremely severe.


April 30, 2025: Initially, Liu Cai-Xuan denied all charges during the investigation phase and remained in custody with no visitation rights after indictment. Following multiple expert testimonies in court, Liu finally admitted to three charges: child abuse leading to death, child abuse infringing on personal freedom leading to death, and injuring a child resulting in death. In court, she cried and said, “I’m sorry.”

社工部分：（檢方依過失致死、偽造文書罪起訴）

2025年1月6日：首次開庭，陳姓社工挺著孕肚，由親友陪同出庭，否認有造假訪視紀錄，由於她去年11月有赴日本紀錄，檢方當庭建請法官境管，庭訊結束前，法官也諭知社工限制出境、出海。

2025年4月17日：台北地院開庭審理，陳姓社工表示心痛、難過，但被起訴很委曲。因起訴書提到的事項、工作內容、聯責，與實際上有落差，與律師討論後，要以書狀向法院澄清說明。

January 6, 2025: At the first court hearing, the social worker surnamed Chen, visibly pregnant and accompanied by friends and family, appeared in court and denied falsifying visitation records. Since she had traveled to Japan in November of the previous year, the prosecution requested that the judge impose a travel ban. Before adjourning, the judge issued an order prohibiting Chen from leaving the country or going out to sea.


April 17, 2025: The Taipei District Court held another hearing. Chen expressed that she felt heartbroken and saddened by the case but said she felt wronged by the indictment. She noted discrepancies between the indictment's claims and her actual duties and responsibilities. After consulting with her lawyer, she planned to submit a written statement to the court to clarify her position.

剴剴案最新進度到哪裡？

剴剴遭兒盟保母長期虐待致死，引起輿論憤慨。網友在「公共政策網路參與平臺」上發動「虐童致殘者，加重刑責至無期徒刑；虐童致死者，判處無期徒刑、死刑。任何虐童性侵案件，皆不得假釋」的連署活動，已有近14萬人參與附議，相關主管機關必須在2025年5月16日前回應此案。此外，也有網友號召5月10日母親節前夕上凱道舉辦「護兒集會」行動，為兒童權益發聲。

The tragic death of Kai-Kai, who was subjected to long-term abuse by a babysitter affiliated with the Child Welfare League Foundation, has sparked widespread public outrage. Internet users launched a petition on the "Public Policy Participation Platform," demanding harsher penalties: life imprisonment for those who cause permanent disability through child abuse, and either life imprisonment or the death penalty for those who cause a child’s death. The petition also calls for a complete ban on parole in all cases of child abuse and sexual assault. Nearly 140,000 people have signed the petition, and the relevant authorities are required to respond by May 16, 2025.

In addition, online activists have organized a “Protect the Children Rally” set to take place on Ketagalan Boulevard on May 10, ahead of Mother’s Day, to advocate for children’s rights.

3/15召開檢討會

衛福部要求兒福聯盟暫停新收出養兒童

衛福部召開記者會提出六大策進作為，包括有出養必要性應由地方政府評估、兒童不能僅因家庭經濟因素出養、縣市政府應與收出養媒合機構密切合作、強化保母的督導及管理機制、加強訪視重點及訪員的敏感度、結合幼兒專責醫師共同關懷未滿3歲兒童發展。



此外，衛福部也行文要求兒童福利聯盟暫停新收出養兒童，並安排召開重大社會事件檢討會議。針對外界質疑為何該起案件發生於去年12月卻最近才被揭露，衛福部回應，「接獲通知時，兒童已經死亡，全案進入司法檢調程序，才沒開檢討會」。


The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) held a press conference announcing six key policy improvements:

1. The necessity of adoption placements must be evaluated by local governments.
2. Children cannot be placed for adoption solely due to family financial difficulties.
3. Local governments should work closely with agencies that facilitate adoption placements.
4. The supervision and management mechanisms for babysitters will be strengthened.
5. Home visit focus areas and the sensitivity of caseworkers will be enhanced.
6. Pediatric specialists will be engaged to jointly monitor the development of children under age three.

In addition, the MOHW issued an official directive requiring the Child Welfare League Foundation to suspend all new adoption placements and scheduled a review meeting on this major social incident. In response to public criticism over why the case, which occurred in December last year, was only recently brought to light, the MOHW explained, "By the time we were notified, the child had already passed away, and the case was immediately handed over to judicial authorities for investigation. That’s why no review meeting was convened earlier."

行政院會　提出4大方向

台北市長蔣萬安也出席行政院會，並向院長陳建仁當面建議，包括北市提出的中央和地方的「三方共訪」機制、落實幼兒專責醫師制度、中繼安置要比照寄養家庭標準和希望中央建立評鑑保母的全國平台等4大方向，希望中央、地方一起努力，讓悲劇不再發生。

由於該案屬於新北市個案，收出養後，才交由兒盟轉介，並交給台北市保母照顧，三方缺乏溝通聯繫，希望能由中央出面統籌協調。

Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an also attended the Executive Yuan meeting, where he presented his suggestions directly to Premier Chen Chien-jen. His proposals included four key points:

1. Implementing a "three-party joint visit" mechanism between central and local governments.
2. Enforcing the pediatric specialist system for young children.
3. Ensuring that temporary placements meet the same standards as foster families.
4. Establishing a national platform to evaluate and certify babysitters.
   He expressed hope that both central and local governments would work together to prevent such tragedies from happening again.
   Since this case originated in New Taipei City and the child was referred to the Taipei-based babysitter by the Child Welfare League Foundation after adoption procedures, there was a lack of communication and coordination between the three parties involved. Mayor Chiang urged the central government to take the lead in overseeing and coordinating these processes.

出養必要性評估

當初是誰做了那個決定？你們真的都想清楚了嗎？

收出養流程漫長，兒少安置成莫大考驗


臺灣每年約有 700 個孩子在尋找收養人，其中成功找到新家的不過 200 多人。協助媒合收出養的民間團體總計 8 個，大多是在為受虐、父母入獄／失聯、家庭失功能或因身心障礙遭遺棄的孩子尋找新家。這些團體基於慈善與專業使命，半世紀以來在政府缺位之下，自行發展收出養業務，包括出養必要性評估、出養人服務、出養兒照顧等。

所謂安置，是要把一個孩子強制帶離他的原生家庭

根據衛福部統計，近 3 年來國人出養孩子的前 3 大原因，是貧窮、育兒支持不足，以及未婚生子。但要評估一個孩子究竟是不是「非出養不可」，仍然不容易。
天主教福利會是其中一個做收出養超過半世紀的民間團體，其執行長丁雁琪解釋：「假設今天有一個未婚媽媽打電話來，說她２個月後要生小孩了，請我們把孩子帶走。接下來你得花時間好好了解，孩子的爸爸是誰？他們發生了什麼事？她懷孕的時候家人知道嗎？他們怎麼說？」

「就算談清楚了，幾個月後，也許生父出獄了、說自己並沒有答應要出養孩子，或孩子的外公外婆突然出現，說他們可以養，一切又會有變數。更別提有些年輕媽媽不見得願意開口，你得去她家裡把每個成員都訪一遍。」


事實上，出養甚至遺棄孩子，對生父母來說常是艱難的決定，對遭遇性侵而懷孕，或其實非常想留下孩子卻沒有能力養育的父母來說，更是天人交戰的考驗。即使是已出養孩子數十年的父母，也可能陷入長期的自我咎責。



收出養媒合單位因此常需要跟家庭密切工作，若能排除父母的憂慮和困難，便有機會讓孩子留在自己原本的歸屬。根據衛福部統計，在每年等待收養的孩子裡，大約有 3-4 成是沒有等到收養就中途結案的，最主要的原因就是原生家庭或親屬最後改變主意，決定把孩子留下。



丁雁琪指出，剴剴案之前，民間單位常必須寫「出養評估報告」給法院，但這份報告要寫得出來，需要的都是時間和信任、和生父母及原生家庭建立細緻的關係。若是草率做決定、將孩子出養，對每個人都可能是一輩子的創傷。

「我們服務過 2000 多個孩子，許多孩子不管是被收養到國內國外，都會回來尋親，去年回來尋親的孩子甚至是過往的 4、5 倍。」她說：「他們都非常想知道，當初那個決定是誰做的？是每個人都想清楚、討論過各種可能才決定放棄我的嗎？」

檢視臺灣近年收出養流程，包括協尋生父／母、監護權改定、社工訪視評估、法院審查、收養人訓練媒合等，往往曠日廢時，早已不是社家署原本以為的「時程短暫」。好幾個收養工作者都指出，過去一個孩子大概 6-8 個月可以跑完出養程序，現在至少 1.5 年起跳。若國內媒親無望，要走國外收養，更可能動輒 3、4 年。

究其原因，除了國際間對於人口販運的防範與人權思維興起、審核日趨嚴謹，也受到臺灣民情與價值觀影響。「臺灣收養人偏好 3 歲以下的孩子，還希望孩子都要健康活潑、家庭背景單純。」兒盟前執行長白麗芳說：「但現在的孩子大多充滿困難與創傷、家庭背景複雜才有出養需求，很多人無法接受這些孩子，常常拖到最後，孩子都 4、5 歲了，更找不到收養人。」


「出養是一個迴力標，你把小孩送出去，他長大後必定想回來、想知道自己是誰、當初究竟發生了什麼事。」

• 111/01/06 剴剴生母向社會局申請出養（因已知懷孕且有案在身無法照顧孩子）

• 111/01/28 新北市社會局立案開辦

• 111/02/21 剴剴出生（由新北市社會局安排保母1照顧，同時安排出養程序）

• 111/03/16 生母與兒福聯盟對接出養事項

• 111/03/17 新北市社會局正式轉介兒福聯盟辦理出養程序

• 111/03/24 兒福聯盟正式立案出養事項

• 111/05/04 兒福聯盟首次與生母交接並轉出剴剴至短期托育保母2等待領養

• 111/05/12 生母失聯

• 111/05/19 兒福聯盟通知新北市社會局生母失聯等事項

• 111/06/17 剴剴移出兒福聯盟安排的短期托育保母2

• 111/06/22 剴剴轉入保母3（周保母）家中托育，期間外婆辦理監護權轉移等事項

• 112/04/06 法院裁定監護權轉移至外婆

• 112/06/21 新北市社會局轉介兒福聯盟（陳社工）辦理出養程序

• 112/07/26 外婆主張希望剴剴可由保母3繼續托育，並希望兒福聯盟可補助保母費遭陳社工拒絕，又保母3期望可加入簽約保母被陳社工拒絕

• 112/08/31 外婆與保母3與社工及保母4碰面，同時保母3特別交代剴剴的習慣及注意事項，保母4皆表示清楚明白沒問題！

• 112/09/01 剴剴正式轉入保母4家中

• 112/09/03 陳社工主動傳送轉出時拍攝之照片表示剴剴狀況很好

• 112/09/05 外婆願陳社工與她通話，陳社工僅打字表示保母聲稱剴剴狀況良好，奶量有增加，會帶他做些小活動，無通話紀錄

• 112/09/22 下午兩點許，外婆表示可否傳送剴剴近況照片，並表示保母3想探望剴剴

• 112/09/23 下午兩點許回傳轉出時照片及未知時間拍攝之照片，剴剴明顯凸髮並遭剪頭髮，身型有變瘦，眼神異常，陳社工表示因頭髮長剪短，並提到預計9/25才會去探望，且表示剴剴感冒，保母希望都對痊癒再探望

• 112/09/25 兒福社工第一次至保母家訪視，看到案童頭上瘀青，保母表示於公園玩耍時撞到

• 112/09/26 台北市居托中心第一次訪視案童

• 112/10/06 台北市居托中心通知劉姓保母回傳健康表

• 112/10/23 兒福社工第二次至保母家訪視，案童安靜無精神，隔日聯繫新北市樹鶯社服中心說明。

• 112/10/24 陳社工主動回傳照片，並表示於上個月（9月）拍攝，身型明顯瘦弱且眼神表情極端異常，加上額頭大面積瘀血，陳社工表示是公園玩耍跌倒，並表示是陳社工親自探訪所拍的照片，稱剴剴過敏不舒服食慾不佳，當天外婆再次詢問是否可讓保母3加入兒福聯盟簽約保母，並徵求所需條件及資料詢問

• 112/10/25 陳社工表示，因應政府政策有改變，目前沒有要徵召保母

• 112/11/19 第三次於公園訪視，與保母討論掉牙狀況，觀察可與其他兒童遊玩。

• 112/12/05-08 兒盟聯繫約訪，保母表達家中有病童，持續以電話與LINE回報案童狀況。

• 112/12/09 陳社工主動回傳照片，身型已完全改變，削瘦嚴重，但陳社工表示她探望時，剴剴害羞所以表情才凝重，並且告知剴剴因磨牙嚴重有掉四顆牙齒，聲稱牙醫要等到大臼齒長出來再幫剴剴做牙齒，並表示保母都用愛在照顧剴剴，等牙醫師後續再做判定

• 112/12/21 劉姓保母同住家人確診告知居托中心未清消，台北市居托中心把原排定無預警訪視時間延至12月下旬

• 112/12/24 陳社工與保母4送剴剴起急診，並告知醫護人員剴剴是由外婆照顧溢奶死亡且聯絡不上外婆，待醫院認為必須通報兒虐且相驗需有家屬在場，陳社工才通知剴剴溢奶死亡，並要求不要告知保母3，外婆誤以為實情如此

• 112/12/26 北市社會局派員至托育地點調查，劉姓保母否認涉案，調查當下發現環境髒亂、瀰漫濃濃菸味

• 112/12/27 保母3經新北市社會局施社工通知才知道剴剴狀況，期間檢察官多次要求聯絡保母3到案說明，陳社工卻不願意提供

• 112/12/27 北市社會局依登記管理辦法規定要求劉姓保母在調查期間不能收托兒童，並向社家署確認此案是否適用重大兒童及少年虐待事件實施計畫，社家署回應涉及托育及出養前照顧，因跨不同業務，需內部討論，若需召開重大會議再通知

• 113/01 月間，檢察官終於聯絡上保母3並到案偵訊

• 113/03/06 檢察官通知複訊偵查，並命證人等製作筆錄，且給予剴剴的死亡證明書

• 113/03/08 到保母4家中招魂

• 113/03/10 辦理入殮、告別式、火化、花葬

• 113/03/20 台北、桃園、台中、花蓮、高雄5大社工工會集結衛福部前抗議

  • 社會安全網只是緩解社會問題的其中一個方法，全面檢視社會問題的成因，不要將社會安全網變成「社工安全網」
  • 重新召開檢討會議，收回要求社工提高「訪視頻率」的要求。召開檢討會議需要有基層實務代表、以及服務使用者等相關意見
  • 衛福部應該與相關部會研擬網路數位媒體時代，保障社工執業安全相關機制。預防社會重大案件後，社工被肉搜公開資料、訪視被怒罵…等情形，提供法律支持追究不實言責
  • 落實社工薪資制度，調查社工晉階問題，激勵資深員工久任；勿僅以進用率來看待社工人力問題，重視社工負荷與量能，協助減輕工作負擔
  • 希望社會大眾成為社工最重要的夥伴，建構一個社會安全網需要全體民眾的支持。「支持一個孩子需要全村的力量」。社工願意盡心成為其中一份力量，我們不是神，不會通靈，盼望社會大眾看見社工的限制

• 20240321 報導者：剴剴之死背後1：聯繫斷裂的公務機器裡，缺乏一致監管標準的保母托育系統

• 20240322 報導者：剴剴之死背後2：除了支援社工，收出養制度中長期缺位的國家角色怎麼補上？

• 20240324 衛福部偕同教育部共同聯合查核兒福聯盟結果

  • 出養必要性評估嚴謹度不足：雖有評估指標卻無具體表單工具，評估結果之審定與確認欠缺外部人員參與共同決策之機制，僅由社工及督導之主觀判斷，客觀性及妥適性顯不足，難謂符合兒少最佳利益。
  • 出養前安置無品質檢核機制：運用居家托育人員(保母)安置照顧，對於保母的招募、合作、簽約、訓練、管理與退場機制等，缺乏完整且周延的規劃與設計，未從負責管理保母之主管機關或運用工作技巧及檢核工具等方式，進一步瞭解兒童受照顧品質。
  • 出養媒合過程未納外部意見：媒合收養家庭過程的篩選、評估討論至最後結果，由社工與督導判斷及內部會議決定，未有外部專家共同討論，缺乏客觀且周延的團體決策機制。
  • 出養家庭的服務與支持消極：轉介出養人福利服務案量偏低，未符兒童權利公約「讓兒少留在原生家庭生活成長」之精神，積極提供各式支持之福利與資源及服務；另無明定安排原生家庭會面之頻率與方式等措施，親情維繫仍應重視。
  • 社工人員缺乏足夠教育訓練：訓練欠缺充足的出養必要性評估課程，及對於案童安置照顧期間的風險辨識、兒少保護議題、特殊需求兒少議題、特殊事件的處理等相關課程與訓練，亦無相關評核機制檢視訓練有否達到提升專業知能之效益。
  • 督導機制不一難以發揮功能：督導機制個別差異性大，未規範明確督導機制、頻率及方式，無法即時且適時提供社工支持與指導，督導系統負有維護服務品質穩定之責，實應檢討並重新建置完善機制。
  • 財團法人管理內部監督缺失：未有專任或兼任稽核人員執行內部稽核書面紀錄，且控制作業未涵蓋所有作業面向；董事為無給職，未支領車馬費，惟查有應迴避而未迴避情事；另原設監察人110年辭職迄未遴選，未能發揮內部監督之機制及功能；組織架構實際設置執行長及策略長，惟其權責與職能分工，並未見於兒福聯盟之任何書面規章。

• 20240327 兒童福利聯盟回應查核結果

  • 收出養流程的精進：將配合中央規範增加評估機制，並加強與地方政府及網絡的橫向合作，引入外部專家審查機制，確保風險評估沒有疏漏。
  • 社工督導機制的改善：在現有機制上，視個案狀況提高訪視頻率、完備數位化資料庫後建立自動化對比評估機制、強化兒盟內部的個案討論機制，納入外部專家建議，提高判斷風險的整體敏感度。
  • 社工兒少保護風險敏感度的培訓：擴大社工例行培訓，引入衛福部推展的SDM訓練，進行兒少保護評估，建立第一線同仁明確的行為準則。

• 20240327 監察委員葉大華、王幼玲、張菊芳申請自動調查

• 20240328 民眾黨表示112年虐兒致死的人數竟幾乎比111年多出將近一倍

  • 111 14案
  • 112 25案

• 20240427 終結兒虐陽光再現 保護兒童我願意集會遊行，下午 2 點中正紀念堂自由廣場下小廣場

• 20240712 《兒童及少年性剝削防制條例》修正草案三讀，增加兒少性剝削行為態樣及罪刑

• 20240716 《刑法第286條》修正草案 三讀，加重虐童刑責條文，對於未滿7歲之人，施以凌虐或以他法足以妨害其身心的健全或發育者，或是因而致人於死、致重傷者等，依各項規定加重其刑至1/2

• 20240925 剴剴案首度開庭

• 20241225 剴剴案2度開庭

• 20250205 剴剴案3度開庭

• 20250316 虐童致殘者，加重刑責至無期徒刑；虐童致死者，判處無期徒刑、死刑。任何虐童性侵案件，皆不得假釋。 公共政策提案通過連署

• 20250319 剴剴案四度開庭 萬人發起「白菊花運動」

  • 剴剴案四度開庭 賈永婕聲援落淚：無法想像有這樣的惡魔
  • LIVE 剴剴案今四度開庭 場外民眾舉牌聲援
  • 劉姓保母姊妹涉虐死男童剴剴 北院開庭逾200人集結高呼不得假釋

若發現兒童青少年疑似遭遇不當對待，請尋求以下管道協助：

※ 衛福部 24 小時保護專線： 113、113線上諮詢

※ 警政署 24 小時報案專線： 110

※ 社會安全網—網路通報專區

※ 各縣市政府家庭暴力及性侵害防治

※ 聯繫各縣市政府社會局（處）

※ 兒少網路安全相關iWIN諮詢：網路申訴專區 ／電話：02-2577-5118 ／email：[email protected]